Re: [PATCH/RFCv4 0/6] The Contiguous Memory Allocator framework

From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Date: Thu Aug 26 2010 - 00:36:19 EST


On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 13:06:28 +0900
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 12:44 PM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
> <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 11:50:17 +0900
> > KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> 128MB...too big ? But it's depend on config.
> >>
> >> IBM's ppc guys used 16MB section, and recently, a new interface to shrink
> >> the number of /sys files are added, maybe usable.
> >>
> >> Something good with this approach will be you can create "cma" memory
> >> before installing driver.
> >>
> >> But yes, complicated and need some works.
> >>
> > Ah, I need to clarify what I want to say.
> >
> > With compaction, it's helpful, but you can't get contiguous memory larger
> > than MAX_ORDER, I think. To get memory larger than MAX_ORDER on demand,
> > memory hot-plug code has almost all necessary things.
>
> True. Doesn't patch's idea of Christoph helps this ?
> http://lwn.net/Articles/200699/
>

yes, I think so. But, IIRC, it's own purpose of Chirstoph's work is
for removing zones. please be careful what's really necessary.

Thanks,
-Kame

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/