Re: [2.6.35-rc1] page alloc failure order:1, mode:0x4020

From: Nikhil Sethi (ààààà àààà)
Date: Thu Aug 26 2010 - 13:54:13 EST

Next message: Matthew Garrett: "Re: [REGRESSION] [2.6.36-rc2] hp-wmi: probe of hp-wmi failed witherror -22"
Previous message: Guenter Roeck: "Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: Add tempX_emergency to sysfs ABI"
In reply to: Eric Dumazet: "Re: [2.6.35-rc1] page alloc failure order:1, mode:0x4020"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Thanks Eric. I have not been able to reproduce this problem after
applying your new patch in about 12 hours of operation. Will let you
know if the bug re-appears.

Thanks
Nikhil

2010/8/25 Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx>:
> Le mercredi 25 aoÃt 2010 Ã 13:25 -0700, Nikhil Sethi (ààààà àààà) a
> Ãcrit :
>> Hello.
>>
>> I am running 2.5.35.3 with the above patch, and I still get these
>> failures. Though they are much less often than without the patch. A
>> snippet from dmesg below.
>>
>> Please let me know what other details I should provide. Thanks
>>
>> skbuff alloc of size 3872 failed
>> java: page allocation failure. order:1, mode:0x4020
>> Pid: 11464, comm: java Not tainted 2.6.35.3 #3
>> Call Trace:
>> Â[<c0243d26>] ? __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x3e6/0x513
>> Â[<c025c293>] ? __slab_alloc+0x2d7/0x2eb
>> Â[<c025c946>] ? __kmalloc_track_caller+0x74/0x95
>> Â[<d09e801a>] ? ath_rxbuf_alloc+0x1a/0x78 [ath]
>> Â[<d09e801a>] ? ath_rxbuf_alloc+0x1a/0x78 [ath]
>> Â[<c0334097>] ? __alloc_skb+0x57/0x100
>> Â[<d09e801a>] ? ath_rxbuf_alloc+0x1a/0x78 [ath]
>> Â[<d0af4100>] ? ath_rx_tasklet+0x2fb/0x808 [ath9k]
>> Â[<d0cbc89f>] ? br_handle_frame+0x1b3/0x1c3 [bridge]
>> Â[<c033d18a>] ? __netif_receive_skb+0x141/0x25f
>> Â[<d0af23c1>] ? ath9k_tasklet+0xcc/0x107 [ath9k]
>> Â[<c02195bf>] ? tasklet_action+0x5f/0x65
>> Â[<c0219873>] ? __do_softirq+0x60/0xc6
>> Â[<c0219907>] ? do_softirq+0x2e/0x30
>> Â[<c02199f9>] ? irq_exit+0x53/0x55
>> Â[<c020392c>] ? do_IRQ+0x3a/0x72
>> Â[<c0202be9>] ? common_interrupt+0x29/0x30
>> Mem-Info:
>> DMA per-cpu:
>> CPU Â Â0: hi: Â Â0, btch: Â 1 usd: Â 0
>> Normal per-cpu:
>> CPU Â Â0: hi: Â 90, btch: Â15 usd: Â32
>> active_anon:6158 inactive_anon:15748 isolated_anon:0
>> Âactive_file:11477 inactive_file:22926 isolated_file:0
>> Âunevictable:468 dirty:5788 writeback:0 unstable:0
>> Âfree:990 slab_reclaimable:3091 slab_unreclaimable:2349
>> Âmapped:1410 shmem:5 pagetables:227 bounce:0
>> DMA free:1000kB min:124kB low:152kB high:184kB active_anon:1304kB
>> inactive_anon:2304kB active_file:2584kB inactive_file:4900kB
>> unevictable:0kB isolated(anon):0kB isolated(file):0kB present:15864kB
>> mlocked:0kB dirty:0kB writeback:0kB mapped:284kB shmem:0kB
>> slab_reclaimable:648kB slab_unreclaimable:752kB kernel_stack:152kB
>> pagetables:0kB unstable:0kB bounce:0kB writeback_tmp:0kB
>> pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? no
>> lowmem_reserve[]: 0 238 238
>> Normal free:2960kB min:1908kB low:2384kB high:2860kB
>> active_anon:23328kB inactive_anon:60688kB active_file:43324kB
>> inactive_file:86804kB unevictable:1872kB isolated(anon):0kB
>> isolated(file):0kB present:243840kB mlocked:1872kB dirty:23152kB
>> writeback:0kB mapped:5356kB shmem:20kB slab_reclaimable:11716kB
>> slab_unreclaimable:8644kB kernel_stack:888kB pagetables:908kB
>> unstable:0kB bounce:0kB writeback_tmp:0kB pages_scanned:0
>> all_unreclaimable? no
>> lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 0
>> DMA: 76*4kB 29*8kB 5*16kB 0*32kB 0*64kB 1*128kB 1*256kB 0*512kB
>> 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 1000kB
>> Normal: 650*4kB 9*8kB 2*16kB 8*32kB 0*64kB 0*128kB 0*256kB 0*512kB
>> 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 2960kB
>> 37964 total pagecache pages
>> 3160 pages in swap cache
>> Swap cache stats: add 164954, delete 161794, find 97931/115609
>> Free swap Â= 937284kB
>> Total swap = 963896kB
>> 65535 pages RAM
>> 1237 pages reserved
>> 29042 pages shared
>> 38802 pages non-shared
>> SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=0x20)
>> Â cache: kmalloc-8192, object size: 8192, buffer size: 8192, default
>> order: 3, min order: 1
>> Â node 0: slabs: 0, objs: 0, free: 0
>> skbuff alloc of size 3872 failed
>> java: page allocation failure. order:1, mode:0x4020
>> Pid: 11464, comm: java Not tainted 2.6.35.3 #3
>> Call Trace:
>> Â[<c0243d26>] ? __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x3e6/0x513
>> Â[<c025c293>] ? __slab_alloc+0x2d7/0x2eb
>> Â[<c025c946>] ? __kmalloc_track_caller+0x74/0x95
>> Â[<d09e801a>] ? ath_rxbuf_alloc+0x1a/0x78 [ath]
>> Â[<d09e801a>] ? ath_rxbuf_alloc+0x1a/0x78 [ath]
>> Â[<c0334097>] ? __alloc_skb+0x57/0x100
>> Â[<d09e801a>] ? ath_rxbuf_alloc+0x1a/0x78 [ath]
>> Â[<d0af4100>] ? ath_rx_tasklet+0x2fb/0x808 [ath9k]
>> Â[<d0cbc89f>] ? br_handle_frame+0x1b3/0x1c3 [bridge]
>> Â[<c033d18a>] ? __netif_receive_skb+0x141/0x25f
>> Â[<d0af23c1>] ? ath9k_tasklet+0xcc/0x107 [ath9k]
>> Â[<c02195bf>] ? tasklet_action+0x5f/0x65
>> Â[<c0219873>] ? __do_softirq+0x60/0xc6
>> Â[<c0219907>] ? do_softirq+0x2e/0x30
>> Â[<c02199f9>] ? irq_exit+0x53/0x55
>> Â[<c020392c>] ? do_IRQ+0x3a/0x72
>> Â[<c0202be9>] ? common_interrupt+0x29/0x30
>> Mem-Info:
>> DMA per-cpu:
>> CPU Â Â0: hi: Â Â0, btch: Â 1 usd: Â 0
>> Normal per-cpu:
>> CPU Â Â0: hi: Â 90, btch: Â15 usd: Â32
>> active_anon:6158 inactive_anon:15748 isolated_anon:0
>> Âactive_file:11477 inactive_file:22926 isolated_file:0
>> Âunevictable:468 dirty:5788 writeback:0 unstable:0
>> Âfree:990 slab_reclaimable:3091 slab_unreclaimable:2349
>> Âmapped:1410 shmem:5 pagetables:227 bounce:0
>> DMA free:1000kB min:124kB low:152kB high:184kB active_anon:1304kB
>> inactive_anon:2304kB active_file:2584kB inactive_file:4900kB
>> unevictable:0kB isolated(anon):0kB isolated(file):0kB present:15864kB
>> mlocked:0kB dirty:0kB writeback:0kB mapped:284kB shmem:0kB
>> slab_reclaimable:648kB slab_unreclaimable:752kB kernel_stack:152kB
>> pagetables:0kB unstable:0kB bounce:0kB writeback_tmp:0kB
>> pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? no
>> lowmem_reserve[]: 0 238 238
>> Normal free:2960kB min:1908kB low:2384kB high:2860kB
>> active_anon:23328kB inactive_anon:60688kB active_file:43324kB
>> inactive_file:86804kB unevictable:1872kB isolated(anon):0kB
>> isolated(file):0kB present:243840kB mlocked:1872kB dirty:23152kB
>> writeback:0kB mapped:5356kB shmem:20kB slab_reclaimable:11716kB
>> slab_unreclaimable:8644kB kernel_stack:888kB pagetables:908kB
>> unstable:0kB bounce:0kB writeback_tmp:0kB pages_scanned:0
>> all_unreclaimable? no
>> lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 0
>> DMA: 76*4kB 29*8kB 5*16kB 0*32kB 0*64kB 1*128kB 1*256kB 0*512kB
>> 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 1000kB
>> Normal: 650*4kB 9*8kB 2*16kB 8*32kB 0*64kB 0*128kB 0*256kB 0*512kB
>> 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 2960kB
>> 37964 total pagecache pages
>> 3160 pages in swap cache
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 3:42 AM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >
>> > Le dimanche 06 juin 2010 Ã 11:56 +0200, Michael Guntsche a Ãcrit :
>> > > On 2010.06.04 18:16:44 , Michael Guntsche wrote:
>> > > > I applied the patch recompiled and run it on the routerboard, trying
>> > > > to trigger the bug again.
>> > >
>> > > Hi Eric,
>> > >
>> > > Up to now I was not able to reproduce the bug, do you think this patch
>> > > can be pushed to mainline or is there a "better"/other Âfix for it?
>> > >
>> > > Kind regards,
>> > > Michael
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> > Thanks Michael for testing.
>> >
>> > I'll submit ASAP an official patch, sent to all people involved in this
>> > driver to get their Ack (or Nack).
>> >
>> > IEEE80211_MAX_MPDU_LEN being 3840 + somebits is suspect, since it doesnt
>> > match 802.11 specs.
>> >
>> > It should be more close of 2304 + MAC header (32bytes) + FCS (4 bytes) ?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>
>
> reading my former patch, I believe I mistakenly used a max_t() instead
> of a min_() macro :
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/recv.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/recv.c
> index ca6065b..0a0dc3a 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/recv.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/recv.c
> @@ -226,10 +226,10 @@ static int ath_rx_edma_init(struct ath_softc *sc, int nbufs)
> Â Â Â Âu32 size;
>
>
> - Â Â Â common->rx_bufsize = roundup(IEEE80211_MAX_MPDU_LEN +
> - Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Âah->caps.rx_status_len,
> - Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Âmin(common->cachelsz, (u16)64));
> -
> + Â Â Â size = roundup(IEEE80211_MAX_MPDU_LEN + ah->caps.rx_status_len,
> + Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Âmin(common->cachelsz, (u16)64));
> + Â Â Â common->rx_bufsize = max_t(u32, size,
> + Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â ÂSKB_MAX_ORDER(NET_SKB_PAD + common->cachelsz, 0));
> Â Â Â Âath9k_hw_set_rx_bufsize(ah, common->rx_bufsize -
> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Âah->caps.rx_status_len);
>
>
>
> Please use instead this one :
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/recv.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/recv.c
> index ca6065b..0a0dc3a 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/recv.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/recv.c
> @@ -226,10 +226,10 @@ static int ath_rx_edma_init(struct ath_softc *sc, int nbufs)
> Â Â Â Âu32 size;
>
>
> - Â Â Â common->rx_bufsize = roundup(IEEE80211_MAX_MPDU_LEN +
> - Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Âah->caps.rx_status_len,
> - Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Âmin(common->cachelsz, (u16)64));
> -
> + Â Â Â size = roundup(IEEE80211_MAX_MPDU_LEN + ah->caps.rx_status_len,
> + Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Âmin(common->cachelsz, (u16)64));
> + Â Â Â common->rx_bufsize = min_t(u32, size,
> + Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â ÂSKB_MAX_ORDER(NET_SKB_PAD + common->cachelsz, 0));
> Â Â Â Âath9k_hw_set_rx_bufsize(ah, common->rx_bufsize -
> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Âah->caps.rx_status_len);
>
>
>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Matthew Garrett: "Re: [REGRESSION] [2.6.36-rc2] hp-wmi: probe of hp-wmi failed witherror -22"
Previous message: Guenter Roeck: "Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: Add tempX_emergency to sysfs ABI"
In reply to: Eric Dumazet: "Re: [2.6.35-rc1] page alloc failure order:1, mode:0x4020"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]