Re: [PATCH 4/4] writeback: Reporting dirty thresholds in /proc/vmstat

From: Michael Rubin
Date: Mon Aug 30 2010 - 12:26:21 EST


On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 5:28 PM, KOSAKI Motohiro
<kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> afaict, you and wu agreed /debug/bdi/default/stats is enough good.
> why do you change your mention?

I commented on this in the 0/4 email of the bug. I think these belong
in /proc/vmstat but I saw they exist in /debug/bdi/default/stats. I
figure they will probably not be accepted but I thought it was worth
attaching for consideration of upgrading from debugfs to /proc.

mrubin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/