Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] ARM: pxa168: aspenite: add board support for keypad

From: Marek Vasut
Date: Sat Sep 04 2010 - 01:24:35 EST


Dne So 4. zÃÅÃ 2010 04:56:27 Mark F. Brown napsal(a):
> On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 10:12 PM, Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Dne Ät 26. srpna 2010 17:27:37 Mark F. Brown napsal(a):
> >> Signed-off-by: Mark F. Brown <mark.brown314@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Ditto, which is V2 and which are just resubmissions please ?
> >
> >> ---
> >> arch/arm/mach-mmp/aspenite.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> 1 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mmp/aspenite.c b/arch/arm/mach-mmp/aspenite.c
> >> index 9e1bd6b..f04bae6 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm/mach-mmp/aspenite.c
> >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mmp/aspenite.c
> >> @@ -24,6 +24,8 @@
> >> #include <mach/pxa168.h>
> >> #include <mach/gpio.h>
> >> #include <video/pxa168fb.h>
> >> +#include <linux/input.h>
> >> +#include <plat/pxa27x_keypad.h>
> >>
> >> #include "common.h"
> >>
> >> @@ -97,6 +99,13 @@ static unsigned long common_pin_config[] __initdata =
> >> { GPIO81_LCD_DD21,
> >> GPIO82_LCD_DD22,
> >> GPIO83_LCD_DD23,
> >> +
> >> + /* Keypad */
> >> + GPIO109_KP_MKIN1,
> >> + GPIO110_KP_MKIN0,
> >> + GPIO111_KP_MKOUT7,
> >> + GPIO112_KP_MKOUT6,
> >> + GPIO121_KP_MKIN4,
> >> };
> >>
> >> static struct smc91x_platdata smc91x_info = {
> >> @@ -193,6 +202,23 @@ struct pxa168fb_mach_info aspenite_lcd_info = {
> >> .invert_pixclock = 0,
> >> };
> >>
> >> +static unsigned int aspenite_matrix_key_map[] = {
> >> + KEY(0, 6, KEY_UP), /* SW 4 */
> >> + KEY(0, 7, KEY_DOWN), /* SW 5 */
> >> + KEY(1, 6, KEY_LEFT), /* SW 6 */
> >> + KEY(1, 7, KEY_RIGHT), /* SW 7 */
> >> + KEY(4, 6, KEY_ENTER), /* SW 8 */
> >> + KEY(4, 7, KEY_ESC), /* SW 9 */
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> +static struct pxa27x_keypad_platform_data aspenite_keypad_info
> >> __initdata = { + .matrix_key_rows = 5,
> >> + .matrix_key_cols = 8,
> >> + .matrix_key_map = aspenite_matrix_key_map,
> >> + .matrix_key_map_size = ARRAY_SIZE(aspenite_matrix_key_map),
> >> + .debounce_interval = 30,
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> static void __init common_init(void)
> >> {
> >> mfp_config(ARRAY_AND_SIZE(common_pin_config));
> >> @@ -203,6 +229,7 @@ static void __init common_init(void)
> >> pxa168_add_ssp(1);
> >> pxa168_add_nand(&aspenite_nand_info);
> >> pxa168_add_fb(&aspenite_lcd_info);
> >> + pxa168_add_keypad(&aspenite_keypad_info);
> >>
> >> /* off-chip devices */
> >> platform_device_register(&smc91x_device);
>
> Sorry I am new to this! If I am updating the patchset based on
> community recommendations should I consider that the next version of
> the patchset or something else? I think I am confused about the
> distinction.

Stick the description of the changes made from previous version to where
diffstat is.

Also, mark "vN+1" only those patches, that are really changed in the patchset.
Cheers
>
> Thanks,
> -- Mark
> -- Mark
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/