[PATCH] regulator: wm831x-ldo - fix the logic to setREGULATOR_MODE_IDLE and REGULATOR_MODE_STANDBY modes

From: Axel Lin
Date: Mon Sep 06 2010 - 04:43:58 EST


Problem description in current implementation:
When setting REGULATOR_MODE_IDLE mode, current implementation set
WM831X_LDO1_LP_MODE bit of ctrl_reg (which is wrong, it should clear the bit).
But due to a missing break statement for case REGULATOR_MODE_IDLE, the code
fall through to case REGULATOR_MODE_STANDBY and then clear
WM831X_LDO1_LP_MODE bit. So it still looks OK when checking the status
by wm831x_gp_ldo_get_mode().

When setting REGULATOR_MODE_STANDBY mode, it just does not work.
wm831x_gp_ldo_get_mode() will still return REGULATOR_MODE_IDLE because
the accordingly WM831X_LDO1_LP_MODE bit is clear.

Correct behavior should be:
Clear WM831X_LDO1_LP_MODE bit of ctrl_reg for REGULATOR_MODE_IDLE mode.
Set WM831X_LDO1_LP_MODE bit of ctrl_reg for REGULATOR_MODE_STANDBY mode.

Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/regulator/wm831x-ldo.c | 7 ++++---
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/wm831x-ldo.c b/drivers/regulator/wm831x-ldo.c
index e686cdb..9edf8f6 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/wm831x-ldo.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/wm831x-ldo.c
@@ -215,8 +215,7 @@ static int wm831x_gp_ldo_set_mode(struct regulator_dev *rdev,

case REGULATOR_MODE_IDLE:
ret = wm831x_set_bits(wm831x, ctrl_reg,
- WM831X_LDO1_LP_MODE,
- WM831X_LDO1_LP_MODE);
+ WM831X_LDO1_LP_MODE, 0);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;

@@ -225,10 +224,12 @@ static int wm831x_gp_ldo_set_mode(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
WM831X_LDO1_ON_MODE);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
+ break;

case REGULATOR_MODE_STANDBY:
ret = wm831x_set_bits(wm831x, ctrl_reg,
- WM831X_LDO1_LP_MODE, 0);
+ WM831X_LDO1_LP_MODE,
+ WM831X_LDO1_LP_MODE);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;

--
1.7.2



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/