On Mon, 2010-09-06 at 13:02 +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote:On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 12:39 PM, James Bottomley
<James.Bottomley@xxxxxxx> wrote:
[ ... ]
So, please understand that code and project workflow is only one of the
reasons why TCM/LIO v4 was selected over SCST.
It isn't yet ... your code still has to be reviewed properly. My
preferred reviewer is currently honing his skills on a diet of raw beef
in Argentina, but hopefully he'll get around to it shortly.
The SCST developers and the SCST users will definitely appreciate it
if review efforts will be spread evenly over both projects.
SCST isn't at the starting gate yet, so there's nothing currently to
review.