Re: [PATCHv11 2.6.36-rc2-tip 5/15] 5: uprobes: Uprobes(un)registration and exception handling.

From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Mon Sep 06 2010 - 14:15:58 EST


On Mon, 2010-09-06 at 23:16 +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> * Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2010-09-03 19:19:09]:
>
> > >
> > > However I would have an issue with making inode based probing the
> > > default.
> > > 1. Making all probing based on inode can be a performance hog.
> >
> > How so? You can add filters if you want.
>
> The breakpoint exception and singlestep account for a substaintial
> time
> of the uprobes probe handling. With increasing number of breakpoint
> hits and singlesteps, wouldnt the overall load increase?
>
You're really not getting it, are you? No, it would result in the exact
same amount of actual breakpoints hit.

> >
> > > 2. Since unlike kernel space, every process has a different space, so
> > > why would we have to insert breakpoints in each of its process space if
> > > we are not interested in them.
> >
> > You don't have to, but you can. The problem I have with this stuff is
> > that it makes the pid thing a primary interface, whereas it should be
> > one of many filter possibilities.
>
> I think the otherway,
> Why instrument a process and filter it out, if we are not interested in it.
> While instrumenting kernel, we dont have this flexibility. So
> having a pid based filter is the right thing to do for kernel
> based tracing.
>
> If we can get the per process based tracing right, we can build
> higher lever stuff including the file based tracing easily.

Creating inode based probes on top of pid based probes is terribly ugly.

> Just to clarify, I am not looking at probing per task
> but probing per process. So the pid field in uprobe refers to the
> tgid.

Urgh,.. I really oppose the whole pid-centric thing, if that means
process wide and not per task its even worse.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/