Re: [PATCH] west bridge, cyasgadget fixes

[Randy Dunlap]

On Tue, 07 Sep 2010 12:44:07 -0700 David Cross wrote:

> This patch contains update to the gadget driver, some of which are based
> on feedback from the Linux community concerning the usage of fat_get_block.
> This function call has since been removed along with all file system 
> specific calls.
> It also contains some fixes for locking issues.
> Please let me know if there are issues or concerns with this patch.
> Thanks,
> David
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Cross <david.cross@xxxxxxxxxxx>


Is there a patch or patch series description where the west bridge is described?

I'm asking mostly because some of the code (in the block driver patch)
looks like it should be in userspace, so I'm wondering why it's in the kernel tree?


> diff -uprN -X linux-next-vanilla/Documentation/dontdiff linux-next-vanilla/drivers/staging/westbridge/astoria/gadget/cyasgadget.c linux-next-incl-sdk/drivers/staging/westbridge/astoria/gadget/cyasgadget.c
> --- linux-next-vanilla/drivers/staging/westbridge/astoria/gadget/cyasgadget.c	2010-08-31 19:32:51.000000000 -0700
> +++ linux-next-incl-sdk/drivers/staging/westbridge/astoria/gadget/cyasgadget.c	2010-09-07 11:12:44.000000000 -0700
> @@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ static void cy_as_gadget_usb_event_callb
>  		#ifndef WESTBRIDGE_NDEBUG
>  		ctrlreq = (struct usb_ctrlrequest *)evdata;
>  
> -		cy_as_hal_print_message("<1>_cy_as_event_usb_setup_packet "
> +		printk(KERN_INFO "<1>_cy_as_event_usb_setup_packet "

Drop the "<1>" ??

But lots of these are purely debug messages anyway, and shouldn't be printed
with printk(KERN_INFO ...)


>  							"received"
>  							"bRequestType=0x%x,"
>  							"bRequest=0x%x,"



---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/