Re: [PATCH v2] vmscan: check all_unreclaimable in direct reclaim path

[Minchan Kim]

On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 2:42 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sunday, September 12, 2010, Minchan Kim wrote:
>> Adnrew, Please drop my old version and merge this verstion.
>> (old : vmscan-check-all_unreclaimable-in-direct-reclaim-path.patch)
>>
>>  * Changelog from v2
>>    * remove inline - suggested by Andrew
>>    * add function desription - suggeseted by Adnrew
>>
>> == CUT HERE ==
>
> For the record, this commit:
>
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=6715045ddc7472a22be5e49d4047d2d89b391f45
>
> is reported to fix the problem without the $subject patch (see
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/9/11/129).  So, I'm not sure if it's still necessary
> to special case this particular situation?


I didn't follow your patch.
If your patch can fix the problem, We don't need new overhead direct
reclaim without big benefit. So I don't care of dropping this patch.

We need agreement of another author KOSAKI.

Thanks for the information, Rafael. :)
-- 
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/