Re: [PATCH 1/4] oom: remove totalpage normalization from oom_badness()

[Pekka Enberg]

On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 9:57 AM, KOSAKI Motohiro
<kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Thu, 16 Sep 2010, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
>>
>> > Current oom_score_adj is completely broken because It is strongly bound
>> > google usecase and ignore other all.
>> >
>>
>> We've talked about this issue three times already.  The last two times
>> you've sent a revert patch, you failed to followup on the threads:
>>
>>       http://marc.info/?t=128272938200002
>>       http://marc.info/?t=128324705200002
>>
>> And now you've gone above Andrew, who is the maintainer of this code, and
>> straight to Linus.  Between that and your failure to respond to my answers
>> to your questions, I'm really stunned at how unprofessional you've handled
>> this.
>
> Selfish must die. you failed to persuade to me. and I havgen't get anyone's objection.
> Then, I don't care your ugly whining.

I haven't followed the discussion at all so I hope you don't mind me
jumping in. Are there some real-world bug reports where OOM rewrite is
to blame? Why haven't those been fixed?

                        Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/