Re: [PATCH 1/8] scsi: Drop struct Scsi_Host->host_lock aroundSHT->queuecommand()

From: James Bottomley
Date: Thu Sep 16 2010 - 22:46:29 EST


On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 15:35 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> From: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> This patch converts scsi_dispatch_cmd() to only hold struct Scsi_Host->host_lock
> for scsi_cmd_get_serial(), and drops the lock because the call into
> the LLD with host->hostt->queuecommand().
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas A. Bellinger <nab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/scsi.c | 3 ++-
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi.c
> index ad0ed21..06e5b3a 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi.c
> @@ -745,6 +745,7 @@ int scsi_dispatch_cmd(struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
> * TODO: kill serial or move to blk layer
> */
> scsi_cmd_get_serial(host, cmd);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(host->host_lock, flags);

So at least from where I stand, my object is to reduce the number of
times we take and release the lock, which this doesn't do. As I said
before: we need to figure out the rest, which likely includes an atomic
for the serial number (which is almost unused). I think the check
against SHOST_DEL is fine unlocked.

James


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/