Re: [PATCH 1/8] scsi: Drop struct Scsi_Host->host_lock around SHT->queuecommand()

[Andi Kleen]

> I don't disagree with the idea of removing it, especially as it has so
> few users, but replacing the host lock with an atomic here would still
> vastly reduce the contention, which is the initial complaint.  The

Actually the complaint is the overhead of the spin lock. This can be 
either caused
by contention or by cache line bounce time.

> contention occurs because the host lock is so widely used for other
> things.  The way to reduce that contention is firstly to reduce the
> length of code covered by the lock and also reduce the actual number of
> places where the lock is taken.  Compared with host lock's current vast
> footprint, and atomic here is tiny.

That assumes that it's contention that is the problem and not simply 
bounce time.

-Andi

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/