Re: [PATCH 0/10] Hugepage migration (v5)

From: Mel Gorman
Date: Mon Sep 20 2010 - 07:14:34 EST


On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 12:33:06PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Sep 2010 10:19:31 +0900
> Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is the 5th version of "hugepage migration" set.
> >
> > Changes from v4 (mostly refactoring):
> > - remove unnecessary might_sleep() [3/10]
> > - define migrate_huge_pages() from copy of migrate_pages() [4/10]
> > - soft_offline_page() branches off to hugepage path. [8/10]
>
> I went over this patchkit again and it all looks good to me.
> I plan to merge it through my hwpoison tree.
>
> As far as I understand all earlier comments have been addressed
> with this revision, correct?
>
> Thanks for your work, this is very good.
>
> But I would like to have some Acks from Christoph for the
> page migration changes and from Mel for the hugetlb changes
> outside memory-failures.c. Are the patches ok for you two?
> Can I have your Acked-by or Reviewed-by?
>

Sorry for taking so long to get back. I was snowed under by other work.
I've reviewed the bulk of the hugetlb changes that affect common paths.
There are a few small queries there but they are very minor. Once covered,
feel free to add by Acked-by. I didn't get the chance to actually test the
patches but they look ok.

> Any other comments would be welcome too.
>
> I am considering to fast track 10/10 (the page-types fix).
>
> I think the other bug fixes in the series are only for bugs added
> earlier in the series, correct?
>

That is what it looked like to me.

--
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick IBM Dublin Software Lab
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/