Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] netfilter: save the hash of the tuple in the originaldirection for latter use

[Patrick McHardy]

On 20.09.2010 17:04, Changli Gao wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 2:18 PM, Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 21.08.2010 00:49, Changli Gao wrote:
>>> Since we don't change the tuple in the original direction, we can save it
>>> in ct->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_REPLY].hnode.pprev for __nf_conntrack_confirm()
>>> use.
>>
>> I like this idea. We could actually do the same for the reply tuple
>> and invalidate the saved hash in case the reply tuple is changed
>> (nf_conntrack_alter_reply()), which only happens when NAT is used.
>>
> 
> We can't do that, as the unconfirmed ct owned maybe dropped, and
> pre-computing will wast CPU cycles in this case.

Sure we can, dropping unconfirmed conntracks is a rare exception,
not a common case. Even under DoS we usually drop *unassured*
conntracks, which have already enterered the hash. If we're unable
to do that, we won't even allocate a new conntrack.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/