Re: "blocked for more than 120 secs" --> a valid situation, how toprevent?

[Mark Lord]

On 10-09-23 10:53 PM, Mark Lord wrote:
> On 10-09-23 08:05 PM, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
> > Mark,
> > If you issued the SG_IO ioctl with a timeout of at
> > least 66 minutes (expressed in milliseconds) then
> > it looks like ata_scsi_queuecmd() has a problem.
> ..
>
> Mmm.. more like blk_execute_rq() perhaps.
> That's where the wait_for_completion(&wait) call is at.
>
> Perhaps I should change it to wait in smaller increments,
> so that the lockup detection doesn't trigger on it..
..

This patch (below) seems to work.

Does this look kosher enough for me to roll it up
as a proper patch submission?   Jens?  Joel?

The problem, again, is that the hangcheck timer fires
inappropriately during very long SG_IO commands,
such as --security-erase operations which take minutes/hours to complete.

Thanks

--- old/block/blk-exec.c	2010-08-26 19:47:12.000000000 -0400
+++ linux/block/blk-exec.c	2010-09-23 23:41:47.478826002 -0400
@@ -95,7 +95,8 @@
 
 	rq->end_io_data = &wait;
 	blk_execute_rq_nowait(q, bd_disk, rq, at_head, blk_end_sync_rq);
-	wait_for_completion(&wait);
+	while (!wait_for_completion_timeout(&wait, (sysctl_hung_task_timeout_secs >> 1) * HZ))
+		; /* periodic wakeup prevents "hung_task" warnings */
 
 	if (rq->errors)
 		err = -EIO;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/