Re: Sensor event related attribute naming.

[Hemanth V]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jonathan Cameron" <jic23@xxxxxxxxx>
<snip>
> We have had naming conventions in IIO for a while but they have not
> yet been terribly satisfactory. Our latest suggestion, which I'm
> finally happy is general enough whilst remaining clear to be found
> in  http://marc.info/?l=linux-iio&m=128394796116223&w=2
>
> Manuel Stahl pointed out that the following summary covers what was
> proposed in a clearer fashion.
>
> <channel>_<limit>_<dir>_<attr>, where
> <channel>: name of the channel, i.e. accel_x0
> <limit>:   thresh, mag, roc
> <dir>:     rising, falling
> <attr>:    en, value, period, mean_period

Jonathan, I am trying to understand howto apply this to cma3000. I
have few parameters like below. Would you be able to suggest how
the sysfs entries should look like for the below parameters or are these
still to be defined.

grange:  2000, 8000 mg 
sampling frequency  : 40, 100, 400 Hz
Modes : Motion detect, Measurement, Free fall

Thanks
Hemanth
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/