Re: [PATCH 6/7 v3] overlay: hybrid overlay filesystem prototype

[Valerie Aurora]

On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 08:04:10PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> From: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@xxxxxxx>
> 
> This overlay filesystem is a hybrid of entirely filesystem based
> (unionfs, aufs) and entierly VFS based (union mounts) solutions.

[...]

> +static int ovl_create_object(struct dentry *dentry, int mode, dev_t rdev,
> +			     const char *link)
> +{
> +	int err;
> +	struct dentry *newdentry;
> +	struct dentry *upperdir;
> +	struct inode *inode;
> +	struct kstat stat = {
> +		.mode = mode,
> +		.rdev = rdev,
> +	};
> +
> +	err = -ENOMEM;
> +	inode = ovl_new_inode(dentry->d_sb, mode);
> +	if (!inode)
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	err = ovl_copy_up(dentry->d_parent);
> +	if (err)
> +		goto out_iput;
> +
> +	upperdir = ovl_dentry_upper(dentry->d_parent);
> +	mutex_lock_nested(&upperdir->d_inode->i_mutex, I_MUTEX_PARENT);
> +
> +	newdentry = ovl_upper_create(upperdir, dentry, &stat, link);
> +	err = PTR_ERR(newdentry);
> +	if (IS_ERR(newdentry))
> +		goto out_unlock;
> +
> +	if (ovl_dentry_is_opaque(dentry) && S_ISDIR(mode)) {
> +		err = ovl_set_opaque(newdentry);
> +		if (err)
> +			goto out_dput;
> +	}

Andreas Gruenbacher just convinced me that every single new directory
created in the unioned file system should be marked opaque.  "New"
means either it replaces a whiteout or has no matching directory on
the lower layer.  The theory is that the topmost file system changes
should take precedence and override any changes (off-line) in the
lower file system.

What do you think?

-VAL
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/