Re: [PATCH] generic-ipi: fix deadlock in __smp_call_function_single

[Heiko Carstens]

On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 10:42:33AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Maybe.  Or maybe it papers over a scheduler bug by gratuitously adding 
> > additional code which no present callsites actually need.
> 
> Hm, indeed.
> 
> We now have the scheduler bug fixed upstream. Do we really need this 
> patch?

General consensus was that it is good if smp_call_function_single() and
__smp_call_function_single() would behave the same if remote cpu == current
cpu.

If you're not applying this patch then at least at a WARN_ON() which triggers
when remote cpu == current cpu. I don't want to debug something like this
again.
 
> > The patch didn't update the __smp_call_function_single() kerneldoc. 
> > Compare it with smp_call_function_single() and note the subtle 
> > difference between "a specific CPU" and the now incorrect "on another 
> > CPU".
> 
> In any case this feedback didnt get addressed AFAICS.

It did get addressed in an updated patch which is the one which you
applied: http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/9/10/245
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/