Re: Default zone_reclaim_mode = 1 on NUMA kernel is bad forfile/email/web servers

[KOSAKI Motohiro]

Hi

> No doubt this is true. The only real difference is that there are more NUMA
> machines running mail/web/file servers now than there might have been in the
> past. The default made sense once upon a time. Personally I wouldn't mind
> the default changing but my preference would be that distribution packages
> installing on NUMA machines would prompt if the default should be changed if it
> is likely to be of benefit for that package (e.g. the mail, file and web ones).

At first impression, I thought this is cute idea. But, after while thinking, I've found some
weak point. The problem is, too many package need to disable zone_reclaim_mode.
zone_reclaim doesn't works fine if an application need large working set rather than
local node size. It mean major desktop applications (e.g. OpenOffice.org, Firefox, GIMP)
need to disable zone_reclaim. It mean even though basic package installation require 
zone_reclaim disabling. Then, this mechanism doesn't works practically. Even though
the user hope to use the machine for hpc, disable zone_reclaim will be turn on anyway.

Probably, opposite switch (default is zone_reclaim=0, and installation MPI library change
to zone_reclaim=1) might works. but I can guess why you don't propose this one.

Hmm....


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/