Re: [PATCH 0/2] taskstats: Cleanup patches

[Andrew Morton]

On Tue, 28 Sep 2010 16:20:58 +0200
Michael Holzheu <holzheu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hello Andrew,
> 
> It would be great, if you could accept the taskstats cleanup patches that
> are the prerequisite for the taskstats precise accounting patches. The
> patches do not add any new functionality. I think they make the code better
> readable and extensible:
> * 01/02: taskstats: Separate taskstats commands
> * 02/02: taskstats: Split fill_pid function
> 

Sure.

I've been sitting on a couple of taskstats patches for ages.  Mel's
delay-accounting-re-implement-c-for-getdelaysc-to-report-information-on-a-target-command.patch
and Jeff's delayacct-align-to-8-byte-boundary-on-64-bit-systems.patch.

I have notes against both of these indicating that Balbir had concerns
and as far as I know those concerns remain unresolved.  So I'll drop
those patches now - can you guys please reactivate them if you still
think we should be making these changes?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/