Re: [RFC][PATCH] PM / Hibernate: Modify signature used to mark swap
From: Nigel Cunningham
Date: Sat Oct 02 2010 - 16:45:11 EST
Hi.
On 30/09/10 08:02, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wednesday, September 29, 2010, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
Hi.
On 30/09/10 07:13, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
From: Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw@xxxxxxx>
Subject: PM / Hibernate: Modify signature used to mark swap
Since we are adding compression to the kernel's hibernate code,
change signature used by it to mark swap spaces, so that earlier
kernels don't attempt to restore compressed images they cannot
handle.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw@xxxxxxx>
---
kernel/power/swap.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/power/swap.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/power/swap.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/power/swap.c
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@
#include "power.h"
-#define SWSUSP_SIG "S1SUSPEND"
+#define HIBERNATE_SIG "LINHIB0001"
/*
* The swap map is a data structure used for keeping track of each page
@@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ static int mark_swapfiles(struct swap_ma
if (!memcmp("SWAP-SPACE",swsusp_header->sig, 10) ||
!memcmp("SWAPSPACE2",swsusp_header->sig, 10)) {
memcpy(swsusp_header->orig_sig,swsusp_header->sig, 10);
if no compression
- memcpy(swsusp_header->sig,SWSUSP_SIG, 10);
else
+ memcpy(swsusp_header->sig, HIBERNATE_SIG, 10);
??
I thought about that, but we'll need to drop the old signature when the image
format changes (I think it will after your patch series) anyway. And the
benefit is not really worth it IMO (it only affects people using the in-kernel
hibernation on x86-64).
Okay. I'm just a little weary because if everything I want to get in
gets in, we're going to then be changing this signature multiple times.
I want to eventually reach a situation where we have a 'proper' header
section to the image that stores (among other things) whether
compression is enabled and which cryptoapi algorithm is used, allowing a
person to en/disable compression at runtime without recompiling or
rebooting. I suppose if I seek to put that stuff in earlier rather than
later, that will simplify things.
Oh, while I'm writing to you: let's not worry about getting my patches
in for 2.6.37. I won't be working on them much today, and want to put
the time into making sure they're right before they get merged. As you
said - let's seek to get things right first time.
Regards,
Nigel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/