Re: [linux-pm] Swsusp patches applied to suspend-2.6#linux-next

From: Nigel Cunningham
Date: Mon Oct 04 2010 - 04:32:03 EST


Hi Martin.

On 04/10/10 19:00, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
Am Samstag 02 Oktober 2010 schrieb Martin Steigerwald:
Am Montag 27 September 2010 schrieb Nigel Cunningham:
Hi again Rafael.

Hi Nigel and Rafael,

As discussed, here are the patches, modified to apply against your
current linux-next tree. A new first patch splits compression support
out into its own file, removing the need to have two versions of the
load_image and save_image routines, minimising the changes to the
remainder of the patches and making things cleaner than would
otherwise be the case.

On my laptop, single-threaded compression actually slows writing down
from 175MB/s to around 100-120MB/s (depending on how well the image
compresses). Reading speed improves from 218MB/s to around 245MB/s. I
expect that multithreaded writing would bring the writing (and
reading) speeds back up. It's on my swsusp to do list :)

Testing this now
(2.6.36-rc4-tp42-suspend-next-vmembase-0-00253-gab9b069- dirty).

Two times I had the rather strange issue that the machine booted freshly
instead of resuming! First I thought I maybe didn't wait until the image
was saved, before turning the laptop off. But now it happened a second time
and also the ThinkPad T42 has a battery in it, thus it should always be
able to complete writing the image.

For resuming I found this in the syslog:

Oct 4 09:19:10 shambhala kernel: end_request: I/O error, dev fd0, sector
0
Oct 4 09:19:10 shambhala kernel: PM: Starting manual resume from disk
Oct 4 09:19:10 shambhala kernel: PM: Resume from partition 8:2
Oct 4 09:19:10 shambhala kernel: PM: Checking hibernation image.
Oct 4 09:19:10 shambhala kernel: PM: Error -22 checking image file
Oct 4 09:19:10 shambhala kernel: PM: Resume from disk failed.
Oct 4 09:19:10 shambhala kernel: PM: Marking nosave pages:
000000000009f000 - 0000000000100000
Oct 4 09:19:10 shambhala kernel: PM: Basic memory bitmaps created
Oct 4 09:19:10 shambhala kernel: PM: Basic memory bitmaps freed

What does error -22 mean?

-22 is -EINVAL. There are a few reasons that it could occur, but rather than chasing our tails, how about if I just tell you that I've been working on a new version of the patches that will provide more detailed debugging of issues like this (printks that can be enabled/disabled at run time) - and hopefully address your issue so it won't happen anyway.

For hibernating:

Oct 4 00:13:09 shambhala ifplugd(eth0)[15127]: Link beat lost.
Oct 4 00:13:10 shambhala NetworkManager[2146]:<info> (eth0): carrier now
OFF (device state 1)
Oct 4 00:13:12 shambhala ifplugd(eth0)[15127]: Exiting.
Oct 4 00:13:14 shambhala postfix/master[2589]: reload -- version 2.7.1,
configuration /etc/postfix
Oct 4 00:13:14 shambhala dhclient: Internet Systems Consortium DHCP
Client 4.1.1-P1
Oct 4 00:13:14 shambhala dhclient: Copyright 2004-2010 Internet Systems
Consortium.
Oct 4 00:13:14 shambhala dhclient: All rights reserved.
Oct 4 00:13:14 shambhala dhclient: For info, please visit
https://www.isc.org/software/dhcp/
Oct 4 00:13:14 shambhala dhclient:
Oct 4 00:13:14 shambhala dhclient: Listening on
LPF/eth0/00:11:25:46:ec:a5
Oct 4 00:13:14 shambhala dhclient: Sending on
LPF/eth0/00:11:25:46:ec:a5
Oct 4 00:13:14 shambhala dhclient: Sending on Socket/fallback
Oct 4 00:13:15 shambhala dhclient: DHCPRELEASE on eth0 to 10.0.0.9 port
67
Oct 4 00:13:18 shambhala kernel: PM: Marking nosave pages:
000000000009f000 - 0000000000100000
Oct 4 00:13:18 shambhala kernel: PM: Basic memory bitmaps created
Oct 4 00:13:18 shambhala kernel: PM: Syncing filesystems ... done.
Oct 4 09:19:10 shambhala kernel: imklog 4.6.4, log source = /proc/kmsg
started.
Oct 4 09:19:10 shambhala rsyslogd: [origin software="rsyslogd"
swVersion="4.6.4" x-pid="1964" x-info="http://www.rsyslog.com";] (re)start
Oct 4 09:19:10 shambhala kernel: r hub
Oct 4 09:19:10 shambhala kernel: usbcore: registered new device driver
usb

Which is not complete. It seems the last log messages prior to hibernating
have not fully been written by rsyslog.

That's not unusual - after we do the atomic copy, nothing gets logged.

Whats going on there? I didn't see this with Nigel's patches without the
readahead patch. But then now I am testing suspend next + his patches,
which may well contain other patches, as far as I understand.

Any change to test with some newer state of suspend-next?

Rafael did you integrate Nigel's patches in your tree?

We agreed not to yet - I'm splitting the compression support out properly, and will then post another version.

Regards,

Nigel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/