Re: [BUG] x86: bootmem broken on SGI UV

From: Robin Holt
Date: Sun Oct 10 2010 - 07:56:20 EST


On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 06:44:59AM -0500, Robin Holt wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 12:43:19PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > * Robin Holt <holt@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Sat, Oct 09, 2010 at 07:59:45AM -0500, Russ Anderson wrote:
> > > > > Yes, Yinghai's patch fixes the problem.
> > > > > Thank you very much.
> > > >
> > > > Will this be included in 2.6.36? It is needed for boot in order for UV
> > > > systems to boot.
> > >
> > > -tip uses memblock APIs. If this happens with vanilla -git as well
> > > then we need a bootmem backport for the fix.
> >
> > And to answer your question: yes, we can queue it up for -final as well
> > if it's a recent regression - 'doesnt boot at all' bugs are nasty. But
> > i'm not sure this is a bootmem problem so please double check vanilla
> > v2.6.36-rc7 as well.
>
> The 36-rc7 kernel does not boot at all either. I don't have any decent
> debug tools to dig in further. It does fail on the same machine that
> Russ was testing with, but passes on any that have a single blade as
> the kernel Russ first identified as being a problem had. Based upon my
> vague recollection of the boot messages, it appears to fail in a similar
> point in boot. I would assume it is a similar problem.

2.6.35 fails as well. I will bisect for as long as time permits.

Robin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/