Re: [PATCH 3/9] jump label: Fix module __init section race

From: Jason Baron
Date: Mon Oct 18 2010 - 10:15:39 EST


On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 12:23:19PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-10-16 at 08:23 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 16:09 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > >
> > > > --- a/kernel/jump_label.c
> > > > +++ b/kernel/jump_label.c
> > > > @@ -168,7 +168,8 @@ void jump_label_update(unsigned long key, enum jump_label_type type)
> > > > count = e_module->nr_entries;
> > > > iter = e_module->table;
> > > > while (count--) {
> > > > - if (kernel_text_address(iter->code))
> > > > + if (iter->key &&
> > > > + kernel_text_address(iter->code))
> > >
> > > Peter, I know you hated this, but the alternative is either:
> > >
> > > if (iter->key &&
> > > kernel_text_address(iter->code))
> > >
> > > or break 80 chars. All three seem bad (although I don't mind breaking
> > > 80 chars for this). But I'll leave it for now.
> >
> > No, the proper alternative is to move the body of the iteration into a
> > jump_label_update_entry() inline function ...
> >
> > Nobody is forcing you to start yet another iteration 4 indentations
> > deep. We have functions for a reason.
>
> Jason,
>
> Could you send me another version of this patch with the second
> iteration wrapped in a function.
>
> Thanks,
>
> -- Steve
>
>

sure. I going to re-spin this whole series - there are a bunch of
changes. Hopefully, I can drop the whole register/unregister notion as
Peter suggested.

thanks,

-Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/