Re: [PATCH -V4 00/11] New ACL format for better NFSv4 aclinteroperability

[J. Bruce Fields]

On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 11:35:07AM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 12:47:38PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K. V wrote:
> > What we need in the first step is to get VFS changes reviewed.Once we
> > agree on the VFS changes done, then we can start looking at the changes
> > upto NFS richacl nfs support. When get that merged then we can start
> > having discussion on how local file system maintainers want to migrate
> > the existing file system with posixacl to richacl.
> 
> OK.  So, personally: I'm resigned to the idea that we want support for
> this ACL model.  The vfs changes look OK to me (and wouldn't be changed
> by any comments I'd have on the more richacl-specific patches to
> follow).  So that's an ACK from me on the first set of these patches,
> assuming it's OK with people to merge these things one step at a time.

Is there any progress on this?

--b.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/