Re: [PATCH 01/11] IMA: use rbtree instead of radix tree for inodeinformation cache

[Al Viro]

On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 08:22:31AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:

> If you want zero overhead and you think nobody uses it (and that seems
> to be the _only_ logic the people complaining about it keep drumming
> on), then DON'T ENABLE IT, FOR CHRISSAKE!
> 
> This thread has been a total waste of everybody's time.
> 
> Did I miss any actual _constructive_ criticism of the patches? Is
> there any reason I shouldn't actually apply them? If there is, I've
> lost it in the roar of pointlessness.

FWIW, I'm OK with that.  My general opinion about the quality and
usefulness of security/* is a separate story, but if we are stuck
with that shit in the tree, let's at least trim down what can be
trimmed down.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/