Re: nfsd changes for 2.6.37

[J. Bruce Fields]

On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 02:02:05PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Finally, we can build fs/locks.c, nfs and nfsd with CONFIG_BKL
> > disabled.
> >
> > *not tested*
> 
> Ok, please make this so, so that we finally can effectively get rid of
> the BKL in this release (I don't really care about the random old
> drivers that may be "depends on BKL").
> 
> But that obviously requires at least some minimal testing by somebody
> who is using NFS heavily, including locking. I assume that the
> connectathon tests include file locking? And I presume that the nfs
> developers run those at least semi-regularly and could do at least
> that kind of minimal testing?

I did a couple connectathon runs just now with no obvious ill effects
except for some sleep-within-spinlock warnings in the lease code.

Yeah, connecthon does include lock tests, though they're just basic
correctness tests.

--b.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/