Re: [PATCH] Fix bug in FUSE where the attribute cache for a filewas not cleared when a file is opened with O_TRUNC.

[Andrew Morton]

On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 16:41:40 -0700 Ken Sumrall <ksumrall@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Signed-off-by: Ken Sumrall <ksumrall@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/fuse/file.c |    3 +++
>  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/fuse/file.c b/fs/fuse/file.c
> index c822458..4fbe62c 100644
> --- a/fs/fuse/file.c
> +++ b/fs/fuse/file.c
> @@ -134,6 +134,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fuse_do_open);
>  void fuse_finish_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
>  {
>  	struct fuse_file *ff = file->private_data;
> +	struct fuse_conn *fc = get_fuse_conn(inode);
>  
>  	if (ff->open_flags & FOPEN_DIRECT_IO)
>  		file->f_op = &fuse_direct_io_file_operations;
> @@ -141,6 +142,8 @@ void fuse_finish_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
>  		invalidate_inode_pages2(inode->i_mapping);
>  	if (ff->open_flags & FOPEN_NONSEEKABLE)
>  		nonseekable_open(inode, file);
> +	if (fc->atomic_o_trunc && (file->f_flags & O_TRUNC))
> +		fuse_invalidate_attr(inode);
>  }
>  
>  int fuse_open_common(struct inode *inode, struct file *file, bool isdir)

What were the user-visible effects of this bug?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/