Re: [PATCH] kernel: make /proc/kallsyms mode 400 to reduce ease ofattacking

[Tejun Heo]

Hello,

On 11/04/2010 03:33 PM, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> I mean the kernel could hide it from uname, but lsb_release,
> /etc/redhat-release, /etc/SuSE-release etc still exist and then you
> can still use the fixed address list table inside your exploit. But an
> exploits needs to have such a list, making it harder to write.

I do believe that making things more difficult to exploit helps.  Many
people seem to think it only gives false sense of security tho.

> I also briefly thought about kernel ASLR, but my knowledge of the kernel
> loading is too limited whether this is even possible or at all useful.

We already have relocatable kernel for kdump and IIRC it doesn't add
runtime overhead, so putting the kernel at random address shouldn't be
too difficult.  Not sure how useful that would be tho.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/