Re: [PATCH] perf bench: add --prefault option for causing pagefaults before benchmark

From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Wed Nov 10 2010 - 04:30:09 EST



* Hitoshi Mitake <mitake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> This patch adds --prefault option to perf bench mem memcpy.
> If user specify this option to perf bench mem memcpy, overhead of
> page faults will be removed from the score of memcpy().
>
> Example of usage:
> | % ./perf bench mem memcpy -l 500MB
> | # Running mem/memcpy benchmark...
> | # Copying 500MB Bytes from 0x7fc036749010 to 0x7fc055b4a010 ...
> |
> | 628.526821 MB/Sec
> | mitake@X201i:~/linux/.../tools/perf% ./perf bench mem memcpy -l 500MB --prefault
> | # Running mem/memcpy benchmark...
> | # Copying 500MB Bytes from 0x7ff1b45e2010 to 0x7ff1d39e3010 ...
> |
> | 4.849256 GB/Sec

Ok, looks rather useful.

We are rather close to being able to apply these bits. We need a resolution for the
arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S details. The ugliest are these kinds of #ifdefs:

+#ifndef PERF_BENCH
.Lmemcpy_e:
.previous
+#endif

What happens if we keep that label in place?

This:

+#ifndef PERF_BENCH
ENTRY(__memcpy)
ENTRY(memcpy)
CFI_STARTPROC
+#else
+ .globl memcpy_x86_64_unrolled
+memcpy_x86_64_unrolled:
+#endif

Could be removed if you defined an ENTRY() macro in perf, right?

This:

+#ifndef PERF_BENCH
+
CFI_ENDPROC
ENDPROC(memcpy)
ENDPROC(__memcpy)

Could be solved by defining ENDPROC()/etc. macros in perf, right?

We could remove this #ifdef:

+#ifndef PERF_BENCH
+
#include <linux/linkage.h>

#include <asm/cpufeature.h>
#include <asm/dwarf2.h>

+#endif /* PERF_BENCH */

if you added empty linkage.h, cpufeature.h and dwarf2.h files as
tools/perf/util/include/linux/linkage.h, tools/perf/util/include/asm/cpufeature.h.

That linkage.h file could even contain a short perf version of the ENTRY() macro,
etc.

That way we can avoid having to touch arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S altogether.

Thanks,

Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/