Re: fadvise DONTNEED implementation (or lack thereof)

From: KOSAKI Motohiro
Date: Mon Nov 15 2010 - 04:11:01 EST


> > I wonder what's the problem in Peter's patch 'drop behind'.
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg179576.html
> >
> > Could anyone tell me why it can't accept upstream?
>
> Read the thread, its quite clear nobody got convinced it was a good idea
> and wanted to fix the use-once policy, then Rik rewrote all of
> page-reclaim.

If my understand is correct, rsync touch data twice (for a hash calculation
and for a copy). then, currect used-once-heuristics seems still doesn't work.





--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/