Re: [2.6.37-rc1-git11] none-BKL-config: stradis.c: error: implicit declaration of function âlock_kernelâ/âunlock_kernelâ

[Sedat Dilek]

On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sunday 14 November 2010, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> with 2.6.37-rc1-git11 my none-BKL-config breaks (-git9 and -git9457b24
>> were OK) in stradis staging-crap.
>> Think the breakage aroses from [1].
>>
>> $ cd ~/src/linux-2.6/linux-2.6.37-rc1/debian/build/source_i386_none
>>
>> $ grep "error:" ../../../../build_linux-2.6_git11.sd.1.log
>> /home/sd/src/linux-2.6/linux-2.6.37-rc1/debian/build/source_i386_none/drivers/staging/stradis/stradis.c:1891:
>> error: implicit declaration of function âlock_kernelâ
>> /home/sd/src/linux-2.6/linux-2.6.37-rc1/debian/build/source_i386_none/drivers/staging/stradis/stradis.c:1897:
>> error: implicit declaration of function âunlock_kernelâ
>
> The driver is on its way out. I'll do a patch to just mark it "depends
> on BKL" to make sure it doesn't get built when BKL is disabled.
>
> It would be relatively easy to fix the right way, if you are interested.
>
> Â Â Â ÂArnd
>

I was enjoying the nice sunshine weather on Sunday :-)... here in
South-West Germany.

Thus I had not had big time to look into the code... as stradis moved
to staging area, it got built this time in a none-BKL-config.
I checked a previous kernel and its dot-config and there was no
stradis inside, so never built before.

As stradis is marked DEPRECATED and I am not using it (even dunno what
it is, sorry for my ignorance), it's not that important.

A "depends on BKL" would be nice for the none-BKL-config folks to not
fall into the "pitfall".
If you have a patch for stradis, I would add it to my patchset.

Thank you in advance for helping to fix the issue.

- Sedat -
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/