Re: [PATCH 4/6] Ext4: fail if we try to use hole punch

From: Avi Kivity
Date: Tue Nov 16 2010 - 08:07:52 EST


On 11/16/2010 02:50 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 02:25:35PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 11/15/2010 07:05 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
>> Ext4 doesn't have the ability to punch holes yet, so make sure we return
>> EOPNOTSUPP if we try to use hole punching through fallocate. This support can
>> be added later. Thanks,
>>
>
> Instead of teaching filesystems to fail if they don't support the
> capability, why don't supporting filesystems say so, allowing the fail
> code to be in common code?
>

There is no simple way to test if a filesystem supports hole punching or not so
the check has to be done per fs. Thanks,

Could put a flag word in superblock_operations. Filesystems which support punching (or other features) can enable it there.

Or even have its own callback.

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/