Re: [Ksummit-2010-discuss] checkpoint-restart: naked patch

From: Alan Cox
Date: Thu Nov 18 2010 - 04:54:56 EST


> The problems found in HPC often turn into more general problems down
> the track. I think back to the heated discussions we had around SMP back
> in the early 2000s when we had 32 core POWER4s and SGI had similar sized
> machines. Now a 24 core machine fits in 1U and can be purchased for
> under $5k. NUMA support, CPU affinity and multi queue scheduling are
> other areas that initially had a very small user base but have since
> become important features for many users.

I'd prefer the trees to be separate for testing purposes: it
doens't make much sense to have SMP support as a normal
kernel feature when most people won't have SMP anyway"
-- Linus Torvalds


Only in this case I can't help feeling that the virtualisation work
already bypassed C/R, solved the problem space that a lot of people care
about and then moved on.

Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/