Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/5] [PATCH 1/5] events: Add EVENT_FS the eventfilesystem

[Mathieu Desnoyers]

* Ted Ts'o (tytso@xxxxxxx) wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 12:52:34PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > 
> > I still say no to stable tracepoints in modules. Once you open that
> > door, everyone will have it.
> 
> What about having KVM define the stable tracepoints in the built-in
> part of the kernel, if CONFIG_KVM is Y or M, and then export the
> tracepoints, such that the tracepoints can be called from a module?
> 
> That way the tracepoints aren't being *defined* in a module, they are
> just being *called* from the module.  Does that seem like a reasonable
> compromise?

As Avi replied separately, he does not seem to think stable ABI is needed for
KVM, given that his tools can deal with tracepoint addition/removal pretty well.
However, let's keep this idea in mind if we ever face this issue with other
"core" modules.

Thanks Ted,

Mathieu

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/