Re: [Stable-review] [39/45] OHCI: work around for nVidia shutdownproblem

From: Alan Stern
Date: Mon Nov 22 2010 - 13:10:06 EST


On Mon, 22 Nov 2010, Greg KH wrote:

> On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 11:51:39AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> > On Sat, 20 Nov 2010, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 13:43 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > 2.6.32-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
> > > >
> > > > ------------------
> > > >
> > > > From: Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >
> > > > commit 3df7169e73fc1d71a39cffeacc969f6840cdf52b upstream.
> > > >
> > > > This patch (as1417) fixes a problem affecting some (or all) nVidia
> > > > chipsets. When the computer is shut down, the OHCI controllers
> > > > continue to power the USB buses and evidently they drive a Reset
> > > > signal out all their ports. This prevents attached devices from going
> > > > to low power. Mouse LEDs stay on, for example, which is disconcerting
> > > > for users and a drain on laptop batteries.
> > > >
> > > > The fix involves leaving each OHCI controller in the OPERATIONAL state
> > > > during system shutdown rather than putting it in the RESET state.
> > > > Although this nominally means the controller is running, in fact it's
> > > > not doing very much since all the schedules are all disabled. However
> > > > there is ongoing DMA to the Host Controller Communications Area, so
> > > > the patch also disables the bus-master capability of all PCI USB
> > > > controllers after the shutdown routine runs.
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > This last bit seems like a major change in behaviour, and this commit
> > > has only just gone into the 2.6.37 cycle. How thoroughly has this been
> > > tested on other OHCI controllers? Wouldn't it make more sense to use
> > > the same quirk condition?
> >
> > Ben is right; let's hold off on putting this patch into any of the
> > stable kernels. There has been a bug report submitted against it,
> > Bugzilla #22562.
>
> Good point, I'll go drop it.
>
> Alan, when it all gets worked out, care to resend it to
> stable@xxxxxxxxxx?

Sure.

Alan Stern

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/