[patch 5/7] fs: ext2 inode sync fix

From: npiggin
Date: Tue Nov 23 2010 - 09:13:00 EST


There is a big fuckup with inode metadata writeback (I suspect in a lot
of filesystems, but I've only dared to look at a couple as yet).

ext2 relies on ->write_inode being called from sync_inode_metadata in
fsync in order to sync the inode. However I_DIRTY_SYNC gets cleared
after a call to this guy, and it doesn't actually write back and wait
on the inode block unless it is called for sync. This means that write_inode
from background writeback can kill the inode dirty bits without the data
getting to disk. Fsync will subsequently miss it.

The fix is for ->write_inode to dirty the buffers/cache, and then ->fsync to
write back the dirty data. In the full filesystem sync case, buffercache
writeback in the generic code will write back the dirty data. Other
filesystems could use ->sync_fs for this.

Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxxxx>

Index: linux-2.6/fs/ext2/inode.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/fs/ext2/inode.c 2010-11-23 21:56:05.000000000 +1100
+++ linux-2.6/fs/ext2/inode.c 2010-11-23 22:05:02.000000000 +1100
@@ -1211,7 +1211,7 @@ static int ext2_setsize(struct inode *in
return 0;
}

-static struct ext2_inode *ext2_get_inode(struct super_block *sb, ino_t ino,
+struct ext2_inode *ext2_get_inode(struct super_block *sb, ino_t ino,
struct buffer_head **p)
{
struct buffer_head * bh;
@@ -1505,16 +1505,8 @@ static int __ext2_write_inode(struct ino
} else for (n = 0; n < EXT2_N_BLOCKS; n++)
raw_inode->i_block[n] = ei->i_data[n];
mark_buffer_dirty(bh);
- if (do_sync) {
- sync_dirty_buffer(bh);
- if (buffer_req(bh) && !buffer_uptodate(bh)) {
- printk ("IO error syncing ext2 inode [%s:%08lx]\n",
- sb->s_id, (unsigned long) ino);
- err = -EIO;
- }
- }
- ei->i_state &= ~EXT2_STATE_NEW;
brelse (bh);
+ ei->i_state &= ~EXT2_STATE_NEW;
return err;
}

Index: linux-2.6/fs/ext2/file.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/fs/ext2/file.c 2010-11-23 21:56:05.000000000 +1100
+++ linux-2.6/fs/ext2/file.c 2010-11-23 22:05:02.000000000 +1100
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
#include <linux/time.h>
#include <linux/pagemap.h>
#include <linux/quotaops.h>
+#include <linux/buffer_head.h>
#include "ext2.h"
#include "xattr.h"
#include "acl.h"
@@ -43,16 +44,33 @@ static int ext2_release_file (struct ino
int ext2_fsync(struct file *file, int datasync)
{
int ret;
- struct super_block *sb = file->f_mapping->host->i_sb;
- struct address_space *mapping = sb->s_bdev->bd_inode->i_mapping;
+ struct inode *inode = file->f_mapping->host;
+ ino_t ino = inode->i_ino;
+ struct super_block *sb = inode->i_sb;
+ struct address_space *sb_mapping = sb->s_bdev->bd_inode->i_mapping;
+ struct buffer_head *bh;
+ struct ext2_inode *raw_inode;

ret = generic_file_fsync(file, datasync);
- if (ret == -EIO || test_and_clear_bit(AS_EIO, &mapping->flags)) {
+ if (ret == -EIO || test_and_clear_bit(AS_EIO, &sb_mapping->flags)) {
/* We don't really know where the IO error happened... */
ext2_error(sb, __func__,
"detected IO error when writing metadata buffers");
+ return -EIO;
+ }
+
+ raw_inode = ext2_get_inode(sb, ino, &bh);
+ if (IS_ERR(raw_inode))
+ return -EIO;
+
+ sync_dirty_buffer(bh);
+ if (buffer_req(bh) && !buffer_uptodate(bh)) {
+ printk ("IO error syncing ext2 inode [%s:%08lx]\n",
+ sb->s_id, (unsigned long) ino);
ret = -EIO;
}
+ brelse (bh);
+
return ret;
}

Index: linux-2.6/fs/ext2/ext2.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/fs/ext2/ext2.h 2010-11-23 21:56:05.000000000 +1100
+++ linux-2.6/fs/ext2/ext2.h 2010-11-23 22:05:02.000000000 +1100
@@ -124,6 +124,8 @@ extern int ext2_get_block(struct inode *
extern int ext2_setattr (struct dentry *, struct iattr *);
extern void ext2_set_inode_flags(struct inode *inode);
extern void ext2_get_inode_flags(struct ext2_inode_info *);
+extern struct ext2_inode *ext2_get_inode(struct super_block *sb, ino_t ino,
+ struct buffer_head **p);
extern int ext2_fiemap(struct inode *inode, struct fiemap_extent_info *fieinfo,
u64 start, u64 len);



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/