Re: [PATCH] x86, perf, nmi: Disable perf if counters are notaccessable

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 22:04 +0300, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 07:27:07PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 19:21 +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> > > Due to BIOS l(ocal)apic is not possible:
> > > 
> > > # dmesg | grep -i apic
> > > [    0.000000] Using APIC driver default
> > > [    0.000000] Local APIC disabled by BIOS -- you can enable it with "lapic"
> > > [    0.000000] APIC: disable apic facility
> > > [    0.000000] APIC: switched to apic NOOP
> > > [    0.008891] no APIC, boot with the "lapic" boot parameter to force-enable it.
> > > [    0.036141] Local APIC not detected. Using dummy APIC emulation. 
> > 
> > Have you tried booting with "lapic" as the second last msg suggests you
> > do?
> 
>  Peter, Don, might not we need something like the patch below -- ie to check for
> apic earlier and do not acquire cpu for PERF cpu bit, and its cpu model, etc
> if there is no active apic? And perhaps for nmi-watchdog, we should not try
> to creat perf event for same reason and simply report that nmi-watchdog is
> disabled (though of course hpet based one should try to continue).
> 
>  No?
> 

Ah, no.. now I get what you mean.

We can use the pmu without interrupt with we miss the lapic, that is
perf-stat will still work.

>  void __init init_hw_perf_events(void)
> @@ -1346,6 +1348,10 @@ void __init init_hw_perf_events(void)
>  
>  	pr_info("Performance Events: ");
>  
> +	/* apic is required */
> +	if (pmu_check_apic())
> +		goto no_pmu;
> +

> +no_pmu:
> +	pr_cont("no PMU driver, software events only.\n");
> +	return;
>  }
>  
>  static inline void x86_pmu_read(struct perf_event *event)


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/