Re: [PATCH 03/13] writeback: per-task rate limit onbalance_dirty_pages()

From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Wed Nov 24 2010 - 05:23:40 EST


On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 12:27 +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> + if (unlikely(current->nr_dirtied >= current->nr_dirtied_pause ||
> + bdi->dirty_exceeded)) {
> + balance_dirty_pages(mapping, current->nr_dirtied);
> + current->nr_dirtied = 0;
> }

Was it a conscious choice to use
current->nr_dirtied = 0
over
current->nr_dirtied -= current->nr_dirtied_pause
?

The former will cause a drift in pause times due to truncation of the
excess.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/