your patch "x86, olpc: Rework BIOS signature check"

From: Jan Beulich
Date: Fri Nov 26 2010 - 08:17:34 EST


... adds a select of OLPC_OPENFIRMWARE to the OLPC option,
which contradicts OLPC_OPENFIRMWARE itself depending on
!X86_64 && !X86_PAE. Are the latter dependencies not necessary
anymore (the X86_64 one wasn't very meaningful anyway, since
these options all sit inside a "if X86_32"), or should the select be
conditional?

Also, how meaningful is having OLPC_OPENFIRMWARE on but OLPC
off (i.e. can OLPC_OPENFIRMWARE perhaps go away altogether)?

Thanks, Jan

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/