Re: [PATCH 3/4] perf-events: Add support for supplementary eventregisters v3

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 16:28 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-11-18 at 12:46 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-11-18 at 12:16 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > 
> > > > > + * Runs later because per cpu allocations don't work early on.
> > > > > + */
> > > > > +__initcall(init_intel_percore);
> > > > 
> > > > I've got a patch moving the whole pmu init to early_initcall(), which is
> > > > after mm_init() so it would actually work.
> > > 
> > > So do you want to make  this patchkit depend on that patch?
> > > Or just integrate it and then change later? 
> > 
> > Doesn't really matter, I can fix it up afterwards, just wanted to let
> > you know.. I can also flip that enable thing.
> > 
> > I'll take these 4 patches and fixup these things and then see what falls
> > out ;-)
> 
> OK, that initcall patch hit -tip and Ingo wants that allocation stuff
> fixed up before committing those patches.
> 
> Could you run another version of these patches (you can ignore the
> checkpatch output that results from the non-std struct initialization
> layout)?
> 
> Just make the allocation path like the AMD NB stuff, use the cpu_prepare
> and cpu_dead hooks to alloc/free and add a refcount in the percpu
> object.

While looking at the AMD code, I think we can do away with amd_nb_lock,
all the hotplug stuff is serialized on the hotplug mutex anyway.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/