Re: [PATCH 11/14] ptrace: make group stop notification reliableagainst ptrace

[Oleg Nesterov]

On 11/26, Tejun Heo wrote:
>
> Group stop notifications are unreliable if one or more tasks of the
> task group are being ptraced.  If a ptraced task ends up finishing a
> group stop, the notification is sent to the ptracer and the real
> parent never gets notified.

Yes. I do not even know if this is bug or not, but certainly I agree,
this doesn't look very nice.

>  	if (likely(!task_ptrace(current))) {
> +		bool do_notify = false;
> +
> +		if (sig->flags & SIGNAL_NOTIFY_STOP) {
> +			sig->flags &= ~SIGNAL_NOTIFY_STOP;
> +			do_notify = true;
> +		}
> +
>  		spin_unlock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
>
> -		if (notify) {
> +		if (do_notify) {
>  			read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
> -			do_notify_parent_cldstop(current, notify);
> +			do_notify_parent_cldstop(current, CLD_STOPPED);

This can race with ptrace_attach() in between.

IOW, this notification can go to the new tracer anyway.

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/