Re: [PATCH 1/3] mm: kswapd: Stop high-order balancing when any suitable zone is balanced

[KOSAKI Motohiro]

> > > > we can't make
> > > > perfect VM heuristics obviously, then we need to compare pros/cons.
> > > if you don't care about small system, let's consider a NORMAL i386
> > > system with 896m normal zone, and 896M*3 high zone. normal zone will
> > > quickly exhaust by high order high zone allocation, leave a latter
> > > allocation which does need normal zone fail.
> > 
> > Not happen. slab don't allocate from highmem and page cache allocation
> > is always using order-0. When happen high order high zone allocation?
> ok, thanks, I missed this. then how about a x86_64 box with 896M DMA32
> and 896*3M NORMAL? some pci devices can only dma to DMA32 zone.

First, DMA32 is 4GB. Second, modern high end system don't use 32bit PCI
device. Third, while we are thinking desktop users, 4GB is not small
room. nowadays, typical desktop have only 2GB or 4GB memory.

In other word, I agree your pointed issue is exist _potentially_. but
I don't think it is frequently than Simon's case.

In other word, when deciding heuristics, we can't avoid to think issue
frequency. It's very important.


Of cource, if you have better idea, I don't oppose it.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/