Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf tools: fix event parsing of comma-separatedtracepoint events

From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Wed Dec 01 2010 - 03:30:49 EST



* Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> From: Corey Ashford <cjashfor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> There are number of issues that prevent the use of multiple tracepoint events
> being specified in a -e/--event switch, separated by commas.
>
> For example, perf stat -e irq:irq_handler_entry,irq:irq_handler_exit ... fails
> because the tracepoint event parsing code doesn't recognize the comma separator
> properly.
>
> This patch corrects those issues.

One other thing we seem to have forgotten in the perf stat area: could we please
make Stephane's --big-num feature the default for perf stat? Big numbers are much
easier to read that way:

Before:

aldebaran:~> perf stat ./loop_100b_instructions

Performance counter stats for './loop_100b_instructions':

23958.911461 task-clock-msecs # 0.998 CPUs
50 context-switches # 0.000 M/sec
2 CPU-migrations # 0.000 M/sec
106 page-faults # 0.000 M/sec
76647095433 cycles # 3199.106 M/sec
110471119457 instructions # 1.441 IPC
10116354483 branches # 422.238 M/sec
518642 branch-misses # 0.005 %
220770 cache-references # 0.009 M/sec
81657 cache-misses # 0.003 M/sec

24.006780937 seconds time elapsed

After:

aldebaran:~> perf stat --big-num ./loop_100b_instructions

Performance counter stats for './loop_100b_instructions':

23869.990497 task-clock-msecs # 0.998 CPUs
58 context-switches # 0.000 M/sec
43 CPU-migrations # 0.000 M/sec
106 page-faults # 0.000 M/sec
76,338,390,893 cycles # 3198.091 M/sec
110,473,163,060 instructions # 1.447 IPC
10,114,252,456 branches # 423.723 M/sec
1,290,825 branch-misses # 0.013 %
1,713,770 cache-references # 0.072 M/sec
188,051 cache-misses # 0.008 M/sec

23.917757467 seconds time elapsed

perf stat output isnt an ABI.

(Btw., we should probably also add tabular output for scripts. I thought we had that
- but apparently not.)

Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/