Re: [043/127] TTY: ldisc, fix open flag handling

From: Greg KH
Date: Wed Dec 08 2010 - 10:59:00 EST


On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 04:09:26PM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 12/08/2010 04:02 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 07:24:46AM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> >> On 12/08/2010 01:43 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> >>> 2.6.32-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
> >>>
> >>> ------------------
> >>>
> >>> From: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@xxxxxxx>
> >>>
> >>> commit 7f90cfc505d613f4faf096e0d84ffe99208057d9 upstream.
> >>>
> >>> When a concrete ldisc open fails in tty_ldisc_open, we forget to clear
> >>> TTY_LDISC_OPEN. This causes a false warning on the next ldisc open:
> >>> WARNING: at drivers/char/tty_ldisc.c:445 tty_ldisc_open+0x26/0x38()
> >>> Hardware name: System Product Name
> >>> Modules linked in: ...
> >>> Pid: 5251, comm: a.out Tainted: G W 2.6.32-5-686 #1
> >>> Call Trace:
> >>> [<c1030321>] ? warn_slowpath_common+0x5e/0x8a
> >>> [<c1030357>] ? warn_slowpath_null+0xa/0xc
> >>> [<c119311c>] ? tty_ldisc_open+0x26/0x38
> >>> [<c11936c5>] ? tty_set_ldisc+0x218/0x304
> >>> ...
> >>>
> >>> So clear the bit when failing...
> >>>
> >>> Introduced in c65c9bc3efa (tty: rewrite the ldisc locking) back in
> >>> 2.6.31-rc1.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@xxxxxxx>
> >>> Cc: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> Reported-by: Sergey Lapin <slapin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> Tested-by: Sergey Lapin <slapin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxx>
> >>>
> >>> ---
> >>> drivers/char/tty_ldisc.c | 9 +++++++--
> >>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> --- a/drivers/char/tty_ldisc.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/char/tty_ldisc.c
> >>> @@ -444,9 +444,14 @@ static void tty_set_termios_ldisc(struct
> >>>
> >>> static int tty_ldisc_open(struct tty_struct *tty, struct tty_ldisc *ld)
> >>> {
> >>> + int ret;
> >>> +
> >>> WARN_ON(test_and_set_bit(TTY_LDISC_OPEN, &tty->flags));
> >>> - if (ld->ops->open)
> >>> - return ld->ops->open(tty);
> >>> + if (ld->ops->open) {
> >>> + ret = ld->ops->open(tty);
> >>> + if (ret)
> >>> + clear_bit(TTY_LDISC_OPEN, &tty->flags);
> >>> + }
> >>> return 0;
> >>
> >> Whoops, this should write return ret; (with int ret = 0;)
> >>
> >> Do you want me to send the patch against rebased on .32?
> >
> > No, send it based on Linus's tree as it's wrong there, right? Then it
> > will move through to the stable kernels.
>
> Nope, in 2.6.36 and newer it looks differently, only the .32 backport is
> broken.

Ick, ok, sorry about that. Yes, can you just send me a tiny patch that
I can merge with the .32 patch to resolve this?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/