Re: [PATCHv3 2/4] ARM: Allow machines to override __delay()

[Daniel Walker]

On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 12:30 -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 12/08/2010 12:26 PM, Daniel Walker wrote:
> >
> > The last time I thought you said there was no size change ? My tests
> > showed a decrease ..
> 
> Oh, right. There was no size change when I moved __delay() into the
> header in addition to the others.

So is there a problem with doing the inlining then ? If you get the same
size kernel, then that seems like a lateral move in your case.

Daniel

-- 

Sent by a consultant of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/