Re: [patch]block cfq: select new workload if priority changed

[Jens Axboe]

On 2010-12-13 01:39, Shaohua Li wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-12-10 at 22:56 +0800, Jeff Moyer wrote:
>> Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>>> If priority is changed, continue checking workload_expires and service tree
>>> count of previous workload is meaningless. We should always choose the workload
>>
>> I'd change that first sentence to:
>>
>>   If priority is changed, continuing to check workload_expires and
>>   service tree count of the previous workload does not make sense.
>>
>>> with lowest key of new priority in such case.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> This makes sense to me.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Thanks, modified the the changelog.

Thanks, applied to for-2.6.38/core

-- 
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/