RE: [PATCH 09/30] sound: don't use flush_scheduled_work()

[Olaya, Margarita]

Hi Liam, 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Liam Girdwood [mailto:lrg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Monday, December 13, 2010 7:32 AM
> To: Mark Brown; Olaya, Margarita
> Cc: Tejun Heo; Takashi Iwai; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; 
> Jaroslav Kysela
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/30] sound: don't use flush_scheduled_work()
> 
> On Sun, 2010-12-12 at 19:00 +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 07:50:02PM +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > 
> > > > For future reference please note that sound/soc is 
> maintained as a
> > > > subtree of ALSA - if you could send patches to that 
> separately to myself
> > > > and Liam as well as Takashi and Jaroslav that'd make 
> life a little
> > > > easier.
> > 
> > > I can resplit and resend if necessary.  Takashi, do you 
> wanna take the
> > > patch as-is or resplit?  Or shall I route it through wq tree?
> > 
> > No need, just merge it along with the rest of the patch 
> however that's
> > going.  I was mentioning this for future reference rather 
> than for the
> > present patch.
> > 
> > Liam, will the TWL6040 updates Magi posted the other day also be
> > affected?  I seem to remember they added the same pattern 
> as WM835x has.
> 
> Not sure myself.
> 
> Magi, could you check your patch queue for any use of
> flush_scheduled_work() here ?

flush_scheduled_work() is not being used in TWL6040 patches.

Regards,
Margarita

> 
> Thanks
> 
> Liam
> -- 
> Freelance Developer, SlimLogic Ltd
> ASoC and Voltage Regulator Maintainer.
> http://www.slimlogic.co.uk
> 
> ¢éì®&Þ~º&¶¬–+-±éÝ¥Šw®žË±Êâmébžìdz¹Þ)í…æèw*jg¬±¨¶‰šŽŠÝj/êäz¹ÞŠà2ŠÞ¨è­Ú&¢)ß«a¶Úþø®G«éh®æj:+v‰¨Šwè†Ù>Wš±êÞiÛaxPjØm¶ŸÿÃ-»+ƒùdš_