Re: [RFC] [Patch 0/21] Non disruptive application core dump infrastructure

[Linus Torvalds]

On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 8:03 AM, Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I think a better way would be adding a ptrace attach which is nestable
> and doesn't have the nasty side effect caused by the interactions
> between the implicit SIGSTOP and group stop.

Don't we already nest at least to some degree? At least you can strace
a gdb session or another strace, no?

                Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/