Re: Signal patchset

From: Greg Ungerer
Date: Thu Dec 16 2010 - 08:28:49 EST


On 15/12/10 20:10, Al Viro wrote:
On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 12:15:10PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:

Unless someone objects, I'm inclined to apply Al's patchset, as it improves the
situation anyway.

OK?

FWIW, there's an m68knommu counterpart (ACKed by gerg a while ago). The
entire bunch is on ftp.linux.org.uk/pub/people/viro/m68k-signals - both m68k
and m68knommu sets. I don't know how you guys would prefer it done, since
there's a trivial dependency between m68k and m68knommu parts of series -
the former has
+#ifndef __uClinux__
+#define __ARCH_WANT_SYS_RT_SIGSUSPEND
+#endif
in unistd.h and the latter does
-#ifndef __uClinux__
#define __ARCH_WANT_SYS_RT_SIGSUSPEND
-#endif
Both parts switch to generic sys_rt_sigsuspend(), for mmu and nommu resp.,
so they need __ARCH_WANT_SYS_RT_SIGSUSPEND defined as soon as conversion
is done. Other than that they are independent.

I can make sure to send to Linus after Geert. Unless Geert you
want to take and send both the m68k and m68knommu changes?

Regards
Greg


------------------------------------------------------------------------
Greg Ungerer -- Principal Engineer EMAIL: gerg@xxxxxxxxxxxx
SnapGear Group, McAfee PHONE: +61 7 3435 2888
8 Gardner Close, FAX: +61 7 3891 3630
Milton, QLD, 4064, Australia WEB: http://www.SnapGear.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/